Home News
News

Middlebury Seeks Grant For Station

E-mail Print PDF

"The town of Middlebury has applied for an $8,000 municipal planning grant in hopes of establishing a rail passenger station in anticipation of future railroad projects in the western corridor," according to the Rutland H

Ted Dunakin, administrator of the Middlebury Development Review Board, told the Herald that 
“(The grant) will help improve the chances of the state getting the funding in the future.” 

Read more...
 

Shumlin chooses Brian Searles for transportation secretary

E-mail Print PDF

Governor Elect Peter Shumlin has chosen Brian Searles as Secretary of Transportation.  Searles was Transportation Secretary during the rail-friendly administration of Howard Dean.

Searles is now Director of Aviation for the Burlington International Airport.  The Vermont Rail Action Network has worked with him in that role.

"Folks in the rail community have been very positive about Searles," said Christopher Parker, Vermont Rail Action Network Executive Director.  "He has experience and a good track record.  We look forward to working with him."

Read more...
 

Groundbreaking Ceremony for NECR High-Speed Rail Project

E-mail Print PDF

 To celebrate the beginning of construction on the New England Central Railroad, funded by federal high-speed rail grants, a groundbreaking ceremony was held in Saint Albans.

 

The speakers in order were:

·         Vermont Governor James Douglas

·         Senator Bernie Sanders

·         Congressman Peter Welch

·         Ted Brady on behalf of Senator Patrick Leahy

·         FRA Deputy Administrator Karen Rae

·         Charles Hunter, Director State Relations – East for RailAmerica

·         David Rohal, Sr. VP of Strategic Relations for RailAmerica

·         Caroline Meal, Senior Director of State Partnerships for Amtrak

 

 

2010 Annual Meeting

E-mail Print PDF

 Brian Dubie and Peter Shumlin appeared before the Vermont Rail Action Network Annual Meeting last night at Burlington Union Station, part of Main Street Landing, along with leaders of the two railroads and the state rail program.

Read more...
 

Study Shows Bigger Trucks Could Divert 17% of Rail Business

E-mail Print PDF
A new study by Carl Martland, Research Affiliate in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at MIT, concludes that allowing bigger trucks could divert enough freight from Class I railroads to add 6-12 million trucks to the nation’s highways.
 
Increasing the weight limit from the current 80,000 pound limit to 97,000 pounds could reduce overall short line traffic by 17%, the study found. Allowing longer combination vehicles (LCVs) – like long double and triple trailer trucks – with weights up to 148,000 pounds could lower short line traffic by 28%.
 
If truck size/weight limits are increased, some claim that fewer trucks would be seen on the highway. However, the diversion of freight from rail to truck indicated above will add traffic to highways, and this traffic will be concentrated near the origins and destinations of the movements that were previously served by rail. The impact of freight diversions is magnified by the fact that three to four trucks would be needed to carry the freight diverted from a single rail car.
 
The higher weight limits would result in 23% less trucks needed to carry the existing truck traffic - the source of the claim of less trucks.  However there would be a 78% increase in trucks due to the shift in business from the railroad.  The net increase in trucks from the higher weight limit would be 54%
 
The short line and Class I studies analyzed a hypothetical set of 100 origin-to-destination (O-D) freight movements representing a typical mix of commodity and customer characteristics that are handled by short line and Class I railroads. For each movement, the estimated mode share was based upon a comparison of the total logistics costs for using rail, intermodal, and truck transportation. Both studies looked at trip distances ranging from 50 to 1,200 miles. A total of nine different truck configurations and weights were considered ranging from increasing the load limits on existing tractor-trailer combinations from 80,000 pounds to 90,000 pounds to the heaviest long double trailer trucks weighing 148,000 pounds.
 
Tags:
 

The Vermont Rail Action Network welcomes the release of Federal stimulus funds for rebuilding the Vermonter route

E-mail Print PDF

.(See also this statement from Vermont’s federal delegation: http://welch.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1212:delegation-welcomes-release-of-funds-for-vermonter-high-speed-rail-project&catid=37:2010-press-releases&Itemid=77)

And Burlington Free Press article.

The train is valuable to Vermont’s economy and environment, but it needs to be competitive, which this work will ensure.  Not only does that benefit Vermonters, but it brings us the economic benefit of making it easier for folks from points south to come visit us (remember 55% of New Yorkers have no car).

Read more...
 

New Amtrak Station Sign Coming In Rutland

E-mail Print PDF

Responding to concerns raised by Vermont Rail Action Network and Freinds of Rutland Rail, Amtrak will be replacing it's Rutland, VT station sign with a new more visible one.  A new sign has already been installed on the front of the building itself.

For me info, see the Rutland Herald Article on the city's approval of the permit.

 

RFP Issued, Proposals Due for "Track 3" Study

E-mail Print PDF

Request for Proposals’s seeking a Consultant for the 2-year Rail Planning Study of passenger service via Bennington and Saratoga NY to Rutland hit the streets on September 10th ,  and were due October 13th.  Between 35 and 50  inquiries were received by the Agency of Transportation in response to the RFP.  Due to the sheer volume of inquiries to be reviewed, according to the agency, it may be November before final decisions narrowing the field are completed.  The work will include market research, engineering, service design, agreements with the railroads.  The RFP may be viewed here.

 

Let's Get to Montreal!

E-mail Print PDF

The map of Amtrak service in Vermont shows the train stretching hopefully toward Montreal, but ending just south of the border in St. Albans – stopping short of serving the 5 million Quebecers who could use it to come to Vermont.

 

The border is the challenge that keeps the train from Montreal, but its solvable.  The Vermont Rail Action Network applauds the work our delegation has done to work with homeland security on making this extension possible. 

The ideal solution for the border would have US and Canadian border agents ride the train and do their work while en-route.  As this seems to be impossible, the next best solution is to have a secure area in the Montreal train station, just like an airport. 

Please contact your congressional representatives to let them know how important this is to you.

 

 

State Submits Application for "Western Corridor" Upgrade, Bringing Amtrak's Ethan Allen to Middlebury and downtown Burlington

E-mail Print PDF

 

Train boards at Burlington Union Station (Main Street Landing) - photo by Christopher ParkerResponding to support and advocacy from local political and business leaders and the Vermont Rail Action Network, the Vermont Agency of Transportation again submitted an application for federal funds to upgrade the "Western Corridor" between Rutland and Burlington and extend the Ethan Allen through Middlebury to Union Station in downtown Burlington.

The state had the benefit of feedback from the Federal Railroad Administration, which is responsible for awarding the funds.  Because of this feedback, the application includes money to improve highway grade crossings the length of the route.

The route was recognized by the legislature as the priority rail route in Vermont for investment.

"This is as strong an application as we could make and the local match shows the state's commitment," said Christopher Parker,Vermont Rail Action Network Executive Director.  We appreciate the work of the rail program and the entire Agency of Transportation.  There is strong political support for this project and it is important for the state."

The federal government will cover 80% of the cost of the work, almost $60 million.  The state will put up a local match which will be covered by $15 million in bonding, which is a lot for Vermont, which has a relatively small transportation budget and bonding capacity.

Gasoline and heating oil pass over weight-restricted bridge from the 1800's in Leister Junction - photo by Christopher ParkerIn order to include highway crossing upgrades and remain within budget, work in New York State east of Whitehall NY and work on bridges was removed from the application.  Bridges on the line, which are owned and maintained by the state, are safe but in poor condition after many years of lack of investment (just like highways).  Because of the bridge condition, freight cars cannot be fully loaded, which puts Vermont at an economic disadvantage and raises the cost of fuel in the state (trains bring the gas and heating oil).

“We believe it’s a strong application,” said Vermont Rail Action Network board member David Allaire in the Rutland Herald. “We’ve got support from the Burlington area down through Rutland County and down to Bennington.”

While improving the line would make it easier for future commuter service to begin, this project is aimed at the Burlington-Middlebury to New York market, via Albany.  The train will leave Burlington in the morning and return from New York in the afternoon.  Top speed will be 59 mph.  Welded rail will replace the old jointed rail.

Grants are supposed to be awarded at the end of September, although given that this is a tight timeframe, it would not be surprising if the process took longer.

 

 


Page 11 of 15
getOnBoard

E-mail Updates

Be in the know!
Enter your e-mail for occasional updates.

Donate!

Click here to give by credit card (via PayPal) or check. Send checks to PO Box 75, Putney VT 05346
Thank You!

Volunteer!

You can contribute! Call Christopher Parker: (802) 579-3394
Overview. Sign Up Form
Train Host Program
Our Special 'Wish List'

Be Heard!

Your voice is critical to making sure that elected officials and the public know rail's importance.
Educate Your Legislator
Community Outreach
Letters to the Editor

Facebook Image

Upcoming Events

Burlington Rail Supporters Working Meeting
04.06.2013; Meeting
The goal is get stuff done, and meet each other to facilitate getting stuff done in the future. ... Read More...

New Amtrak Service?

The following Amtrak improvements in Vermont are under discussion but take money and your political support.  Please sign up at left for e-mail updates, write to your representatives and a letter to the editor and consider volunteering to help make these enhancements reality.

Burlington - Middlebury to New York
Vermonter to Montreal
Multiple frequencies from Rutland, Bennington to New York
"Knowlege Corridor:" faster, more frequent service to New York from White River Jc, Bellows Falls & Brattleboro
Boston - Burlington - Montreal high speed rail

Environmental Benefits of Rail

 

44% of greenhouse gasses in Vermont are produced by transportation (nationally, it's 28%).  If we are serious about the environment we have to change transportation.

Shipping by rail instead of truck reduces pollution (on average) by two-thirds, noise by one half, uses only 29% of the fuel and produces only 23% as much greenhouse gasses.  Freight Rail Carbon Calculator

The U.S. transportation system is 96% petroleum dependent, accounts for 71% of the country’s oil use, and consumes 25% of the world’s net output. 

Passenger trains are 20-40% more efficient.  But consider: if the train is already going there, the carbon footprint of you  riding it is *zero* !  

Rail facilitates better land use, which may make the biggest difference.