Home
ethan allen

There is a  major reason why we cannot close the Ethan Allen, because it is part of a major corridor project for the Rutland Region and Western Vermont.

The strategic funding plan for the  Western Transportation Corridor Project included improvements to US RT 7 and rail improvements on western lines, from St. Albans to Bennington, ending in Rensselaer NY.  The improvements are broken into small projects but are part of the whole plan to improve the  transportation network in Southwestern VT.   The Ethan Allen will be a stepping stone to the Albany, Bennington, Rutland, Burlington, Essex (ABRBE) Regional Passenger and Freight System to serve Vermonters in state, Tourism  business travelers and the Southwestern Vt Economy (JOBS).  This system is going to be a seamless service to connect to the southern and western section of US freight and passenger service. This would be the final stage. To stop at stage 1 of the plan, the Ethan Allen,  would cut future federal funding and private investment to this Corridor Project. This Rail project has been key to getting major federal funding for track improvements and highway improvement funds. (Senator Jefford’s Legacy Bill $30 million rail improvement)

This was the deal to abandon the Rutland Bypass Project during the 1980's (proposed $175,000 Million project). The State and the Rutland Region agreed to improve existing corridor projects (rail and RT 7) are a major part of this agreement. Therefore, why are we not funding the  largest transportation plan in the state.  During the 1950’s when Interstate 91 and 89 were built, Southwestern Vermont had been promised  that western Vermont was next for improvements. We cannot pull one small piece of corridor infrastructure that’s supporting the economic or transportation network in southwestern Vermont without hurting  the whole structure.

We are not asking for a new highway, interstate or rail projects, we are just asking to improve what we have in place today.   This has been the Agency of Transportation's policies for five years. So, when are we going to finally say that it is time to keep our promises and complete and preserve these western corridor improvement projects.

The Ethan Allen is part of this promise.

 
altHere are numerous unanswered questions and points regarding the VAOT Amtrak Bus that should be raised with the Governor and legislators. The Rutland County delegation is unified in their opposition to the administrations proposal and understands the economic importance of the train.
1) The Administration is promoting the bus as an improvement over the train to Rutland. When asked recently no Amtrak passengers seem to agree.
2) They also say it is temporary. Even the Governor himself gave caution in the Rutland Herald recently about that point.
3) Amtrak indicated last week that there is a deficient in equipment in the US so if we eliminate the Ethan Allen Express train it will get quickly scooped up and may be a long wait to get it back.
Read more...  
Amtrak's Ethan Allen in Rutland    The ETHAN ALLEN is a successful and growing service: Patronage on the
ETHAN ALLEN has been growing every month for most of the last two
years. Overall ridership in FY 2008 climbed 17.5%, with revenues up
13.6%. It is completely counter-productive to squander this gain with
a "bustitution" that will not work. Rather we can enhance the train
with a properly-designed bus connection and gain added revenues higher
than the projected savings from the train-off proposal.

    Once gone there is little chance the train will ever return: The last
passenger service before the ETHAN ALLEN on the
Albany-Whitehall-Rutland route closed in 1937, 59 years before the
ETHAN ALLEN began in 1996. The last service on the more direct line
from Troy to Bennington, Rutland and Burlington was lost in 1953.

    If the ETHAN ALLEN is canceled Amtrak is certain to reassign its
equipment, as the company is already desperately short of cars. Once
the cars are gone Vermont will have to buy new cars in order to
restore service. Even at today's prices this would cost us at least
$3,000,000 per car and probably more by 2013.
Read more...  

[Published in the Times-Argus, and the Rutland Herald]
Used with Permission.

altIt was very disturbing to see the recent piece in the Free Press
suggesting that the Vermont Agency of Transportation was flirting with
massive cut-backs in Vermont's Amtrak services. This comes just as we
have a new administration in Washington strongly committed to rail and
after our Congressional delegation got language into the new Amtrak
authorization making future Vermont/Amtrak capital projects like the
purchase of new diesel multiple unit cars potentially eligible for 80%
Federal funding. Most particularly it is alarming in the face of the
unprecedented recent ridership gains on our trains.

Read more...  
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Powered by Tags for Joomla
getOnBoard

E-mail Updates

Be in the know!
Enter your e-mail for occasional updates.

Donate!

Click here to give by credit card (via PayPal) or check. Send checks to PO Box 75, Putney VT 05346
Thank You!

Volunteer!

You can contribute! Call Christopher Parker: (802) 579-3394
Overview. Sign Up Form
Train Host Program
Our Special 'Wish List'

Be Heard!

Your voice is critical to making sure that elected officials and the public know rail's importance.
Educate Your Legislator
Community Outreach
Letters to the Editor

Facebook Image

Upcoming Events

Burlington Rail Supporters Working Meeting
04.06.2013; Meeting
The goal is get stuff done, and meet each other to facilitate getting stuff done in the future. ... Read More...